Who made this page, and why
Who makes this
My name is Petros Chatzianastasiou. I am not a doctor, pharmacist, psychologist or psychiatrist — I am an engineer and I have worked in the technical trades for decades. I have no financial or professional relationship with pharmaceutical companies.
That means two things: I have no stake in what you conclude — and I am not asking you to take anything on my word. Every claim on this site cites its primary source.
Why I make it
The site began with a poster circulating on social media that linked celebrity deaths to psychiatric drugs. I checked its claims one by one: several collapsed. But underneath the noise there was a real, documented story — guilty pleas, billion-dollar fines, regulatory warnings — that rarely reaches the public together with its sources. Anyone taking these medicines in good faith deserves information that survives scrutiny: neither fearmongering nor false reassurance.
How it was made
Three rules, without exception:
- Primary sources only — the US Department of Justice, FDA, MHRA, NICE, peer-reviewed journals, the Greek national prescription database.
- Whatever is scientifically open is presented with both sides, each with its citations.
- Explicitly excluded: sources without citations, activist sites without primary documentation, and organisations serving the same purpose — so that the information is genuinely objective.
AI tools were also used to research and locate the sources; no claim was published without verification against the primary source itself. If you find an error, please send me a message — corrections are noted.
The site has no ads, sponsors or revenue, and collects no visitor data.
I bring into the light what it suits others to keep hidden. If someone doesn't like that — too bad. To everyone else: enjoy the reading.
What happens when a source disappears
The documents this page rests on are not permanent. A regulator's letter comes down from its website once the file is closed. A link to an official gazette stops working after a reorganisation. A public authority's list changes content with no date and no notice.
When that happens, the claim resting on the document does not merely become unsourced. It becomes impossible to disprove. The reader can neither confirm nor refute it, and is left deciding whether to trust the author — which is precisely what this page does not ask of anyone.
So every source is retrieved, stored, and fingerprinted with a SHA-256 checksum, together with the date of retrieval. Beneath each citation you will find the first digits of that checksum and the date. The checksum changes if a single character of the document changes.
Archiving happens at two levels, out of respect for copyright:
- Public documents — court judgments, official gazettes, regulators' decisions, European Union and international organisation documents. A full copy is published, reachable from the line beneath the citation.
- Journal articles — not reproduced. What is recorded is the publishing registry's metadata (title, journal, year, publisher) and the checksum of that record. This makes it verifiable that the identifier cited does correspond to the article described, without republishing anyone else's text.
The archive is rechecked periodically. The check reports two things: which links have stopped working and — more importantly — which documents changed content while the link still works. The second goes unnoticed without a checksum.
Current coverage, stated plainly. Of the 99 sources on this page, 85 are archived — 28 as a full copy and 57 as a metadata record. The remaining 14 have no stable address yet, or their publisher does not permit automated access.
Sources not yet archived are cited in full — title, issuing body, document number, date — and can be found by anyone who looks for them. What they lack is a stable address and a copy, and the marker beneath each citation says so.